Bicycle drivers “own” the road to the same extent as motorists. The driver in front is supposed to have the right-of-way and lane control whether the driver is on a bicycle or another vehicle. Photo courtesy of Karen Karabell, St. Louis.

According to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) the
SHARE THE ROAD plaque is supposed to warn motorists that bicyclists are traveling along the highway. So why doesn’t it say that or something similar? Why the ambiguous SHARE THE ROAD message?

The W11-1 bicycle icon warning sign as a stand alone sign is sufficient to alert motorists to downstream bicyclists. Adding the W16-1 SHARE THE ROAD plaque results in a message that can be used and mis-interpreted the opposite of its officially intended meaning. If a supplemental plaque is to be used, there are better options than SHARE THE ROAD to warn motorists of bicycle users ahead.


The authorities in California show their hand with this installation with a regulatory sign instructing bicyclists to RIDE SINGLE FILE. Photo courtesy of Lee V. Milon and Davis Bike Club.

The SHARE THE ROAD plaque is sometimes mis-interpreted by both motorists and bicyclists to mean that bicycle users are to SHARE THE LANE by riding far right. The plaque implies the falsehood that motorists control the lane, and can choose to share some of it with bicycle users.

The SHARE THE ROAD plaque is typically misplaced on narrow roads whose lanes are not amenable for sharing side-by-side. It does not fulfill 3 of the 5 requirements of a traffic control device as described in the MUTCD.

In contrast, the new R4-11 BICYCLES MAY USE FULL LANE regulatory sign is unambiguous. It is the evolution, and supersedes the SHARE THE ROAD warning sign as the preferable message to motorists and bicyclists. A CHANGE LANES TO PASS supplemental plaque would provide added direction.

The Share The Road Sign paper HERE discusses this combination sign, and provides a rationale for dispensing with the “SHARE THE ROAD” placard.

12 Responses to ““SHARE THE ROAD” sign”

  1. steve magas Says:

    My thoughts are aptly expressed in “Share the Road, STINKS”
    http://www.ohiobikelawyer.com/uncategorized/2010/09/share-the-road-stinks/

    You hit it on the head in that the signs are misinterpreted. However, around here they are used on the big, wide bike thoroughfares and not, generally, on those tight curvy roads where bikes are permitted but not really tolerated by motorists… they should be called “Bikes Might Be In The Way” signs for motorists…

  2. Bruce Kulik Says:

    I always thought the sign should say “Expect Bicycle Traffic” as a reminder to be vigilant (which they should be at all times anyway). Of course, to follow up on Steve’s comment, that might be interpreted as “Expect Bicycles To Be In The Way”.

  3. jerryfoster Says:

    I like Change Lanes to Pass – the current sign is good on intent but poor on specifics, in my view. In NJ there’s a law that applies when encountering horses on the roadway, which requires slowing to 25mph and following the horseperson’s hand signals for when to pass. I like that approach better than the current ambiguity, too, and believe it could be adopted/adapted for bicyclists.

  4. trevor Says:

    “Narrow Lane”

  5. Wayne Pein Says:

    All good thoughts. Thanks.

  6. Chuck Davis Says:

    STR signs are wasted paint, no one has to share anything if they don’t want to, not sharing is not actionable

    Use caution, Bicycles on the Road (or similar), not using “caution” IS actionable…………….its called negligence

  7. David Takemoto-Weerts Says:

    Please note that the “Ride Single File” sign in the photo above was apparently installed by California’s Solano County Public Works Dept. It’s a local anomaly that we hope to get removed soon. It’s not a sign for statewide use.

  8. Wayne Pein Says:

    Thanks David. Irrespective of the installing agency, the “Ride Single File” paired with the STR sign exemplifies the misinterpretation and misuse of the STR sign.


  9. I am going to mount a milk crate on top of my rear bike rack. I am going to bolt a reflective R4-11 “BIKE MAY USE FULL LANE” sign to the milk crate. The standard sign is 30”, so I will need to special order a smaller size. It is going to be glorious!

  10. Alex C Says:

    Coming to this post late.

    I like signs with just the bike symbol or those with “CAUTION BICYCLES” in heavy traffic or otherwise areas with higher probabilities of adverse incidents.

    One feature of a poor sign is that as reasonable person could infer that it applies to only that circumstance or stretch of road when in fact it is intended as a reminder of something that more generally applies. For this reason “BICYCLES MAY USE FULL LANE” is not that useful in my mind: it could be reasonably inferred by a motorist that if that sign isn’t present, bicycles may not use the full lane; just like a motorist who thinks that if a STR isn’t present, bicycles are subservient. This is not a problem when it comes to just reminding motorists that bikes are a fact (with a simple bike symbol).

    “CHANGE LANE TO PASS”: so does that apply to bikes, which are also vehicles? Probably not, so I don’t like that solution either.

  11. Wayne Pein Says:

    Hi Alex,

    Yes, some others share similar concerns that you note. But using that same logic, should motorists not think about bicyclists on roads that don’t have a simple bicycle icon sign?

    Regards,
    Wayne


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: